Do Zionists dream of Islamo-Christian enmity ?
The case against alliance with the Muslims. Part 2: Contemporary facts and History.
The first part of this reflexion may seem bizarre, since it needs a profound consciousness of the importance of ethno-cultural factors in order to simply intellectually compute it. Why talk about the Islamic psyche, then ? Because of the importance of group behaviour in political matters. If one has to work with a group of potentially violent bipolar hysteric liars1, it would be better for him to know about them before experiencing such a behavior. In fact, such a prior knowledge would make him chose to not work with this group, because that would be of no benefit for his business, on top of personally putting him at risk. Also, because to present violent terrorists as “zionist pawns” as if their behavior was unexpected from members of Islamic populations is disingenuous, and deflects actual responsibilities to an inexistent supernatural demiurgic entity called the Zionist (which is not the same thing as actual zionists, or even Jews).
Case study: France
Some “dissidents” in France have been trying to intoxicate the Right by calling for a Christian-Muslim alliance against zionism for a couple of decades now. The base for defending that position is that Islamic populations are seen as more traditional, therefore less-likely to accept progressist political parties, less-likely to bow down before the mainstream views, and other things of that genre. The very traditional antijudaism (that became an absolutely central part of the French Right after the defeat of 1870, especially after the Dreyfus Affair in 1894) in French politics also is a key element in understanding the roots of such a tendency.
Alain Soral probably is the most important of these dissidents. Ex-communist (who yet still defines himself as marxist), author of best-sellers on fashion, marketing and PUA techniques in the 1980s and 1990s, ex-member of the Parisian scene, we could see him on TV Shows until the mid-2000s. He then was a victim of cancel culture and grew very bitter after having been excluded from the mediatic milieu for having criticized Jewish communitarianism. He created the association Égalité et Réconciliation and went on to work with the Front National2 from 2005 (to prepare the 2007 presidential elections) to 2009 and pushed for trying to get votes from ethnic ghettoes, which meant distancing the Party from “racism” and “racists”.
It led to a complete fiasco and he then quit the Party, went on with his association and created an “antizionist list” for European elections in 2009.
They did 1.3% in the Parisian region, mainly in vastly Muslim cities.
This is a good example of what not to do, yet some still are very attached to this idea, out of romanticism or opportunism3, but rarely out of a sane political concern. Clanic psyche is not taken into account by such people, who think, when they are not completely cynical, that Muslims act like Whites, out of metaphysical principles, that they prefer such principles over anything, and that they do not instinctly feel what’s better between leftists who give them money, housing and the possibility to islamize in the name of freedom of speech, and rightists who want to stop all that and deport them back to the Third-World. But let us go back to the idea of a Christian-Muslim alliance, and to the idea that the Right should rely on Muslims (or generally speaking Third-Worlder) in order to win. To win what ?
A very eloquent 2015 review of statistic literature gives the following data on Muslim vote in France. In 1986-1987, in the very populous Parisian region, 83% of the Muslim youth positioned themselves to the Left, against 58% of the Catholic youth and 42% of French Natives, generally speaking. Between 1988 and 2001, it is estimated that Muslims positioned themselves 46% to the Left (30% of the total interrogated), 36% neither left nor right (38%), 12% to the Center (13%) and 4% to the Right (17%), and that 76% of Muslims feel close to a Left-winged Party (47%). From 2003 to 2005, around 45% of French Muslims feel close to the Socialist Party, around 18% to the far-left and the Communist Party, around 10% to the Greens, and only around 9% to the Right. A survey from 2005 found that 76% of the French of African, North-African and Turkish ascent feel close to a Left-winged Party and 63% place themselves to the Left.
In the first turn of the 2002 election, Native French voted 40% to the Left, 35% to the Right, and 21% for the Far-Right. Muslims voted 69% to the Left, 21% to the Right, and only 7% to the Far-Right. In 2007, 80% of French of Maghrebi and African ascent voted for the Socialist Party in the second turn of the elections, against 44% of Native French. The study remarks that compared to the Natives, French of Turkish ascent are 4 times more likely to position themselves to the Left, and Algerians are 6 times more likely to do so. On the other hand, no French with non-French European ascent is more likely to position himself to the Left.4
The continuity in that data truly is fascinating, and the “based Muslim that will help the Right advance” rhetoric takes a serious hit.
An interesting parallel could be done with the evolution of the “Zionist vote” in France, caused by the growing ethnic chaos, leading part of French Jews5 to question multiculturalism6. France has the third largest Jewish population in the world (around 500 000), after Israel and the United-States. The cultural elite has been marked by this presence, and Jews were, just as in the US, quite overrepresented in the Leftist and Communist intelligentsia. Both founders of the historical “SOS Racisme” were Jewish trotskyite, and there was an overrepresentation of Jews from the Union of French Jewish students in it7.
However, the growing presence of Muslim communities that are fed with hatred of the West becomes problematical to their eyes, especially since for a Third-Worlder, the West, Imperialism, Whites, Israel, America and Zionism are quite synonymous. The Front National Party has been seen as very negatively ideologically and emotionally charged (an argument that gets continually used is that one of its founding figures, François Bousquet, was a soldier in the SS-Charlemagne during WW2; its main figure, Jean-Marie Le Pen, sometimes used antisemitic dogwhistles and supported Arab powers in geopolitics), and was generally shunned by Jewish voters for that, nearly to this day.
Several recent changes can be underlined. The apparition of a new Far-Right Party led by a Jewish (and even zionist) figure, Éric Zemmour, reveals a complete shift from the usual attitude of French Jews. Zemmour is nothing like a coward and is even more radical than the Front National: he talked on the TV and in his books, among other things, about : the Jewish involvment in the Bolshevik Revolution, the anti-French attitude of Jewish lobbies, the Great Replacement, the necessity to defend French natives, the Frenchness and White aspects of French and European culture, the danger of islamization, the necessity of Remigration and so on. He defended the memory of Marshall Pétain, who led Occupied France and collaborated with Hitler, and says very clearly that the nazi scarecrow needs to stop being used since “World War 2 is over, Hitler has been dead for 75 years, and today, the problem is not nazis saying Heil Hitler but people shouting Allah akbar beheading French and Jews”8. 53.6% of French citizens living in Israel voted for Zemmour in 2022, when only around 7% of French nationals did so.
The normalization of the Front National, coupled with the current ethno-religious issues also completely disrupts the traditional attitudes of French Jews towards this Party. The 7 October attack on Israel were vocally supported by Far-left Parties such as La France insoumise (LFI)9, when Right-winged Parties condemned them in unison, leading a figure representative of Zionism in the French Assembly, Meyer Habib, to publically shun a representative of LFI during an homage to the French victims of the attacks and to salute Jordan Bardella, who represents the Front National. Such a scene would have been unimaginable only a couple of years ago.
These elements should therefore lead one to question a lot of elements of the pro-Muslim dissident narrative. In fact, if we’re equating “Zionists” to the current State, it is in no way trying to divide the French between Christians and Muslims. Quite the contrary, the State silences any divisive voice when it can, gives money to the Brown masses endlessly, thinking it will pacify them10. I am sure some parallels could be made with Trump and the evolution of American Jews’ attitude, but it is important to note that things are far more complex due to the very high price of Israel to the American taxpayer, and to the essentially geopolitical aspect of such an alliance, the USA not having a big Muslim minority.
“Christian-Muslim alliance” and History
Another thing to consider, before advocating for this Christian-Muslim alliance that zionists fear, would be the attitude of Muslim populations towards the West, Whites and Christians, and the attitude of Western Christians who experienced Islamic rule.
The infamous Romanian Vlad Tepes was an hostage of the Ottomans, who practiced the Devshirme, the forcible recruitment of children from Christian Balkanic communities who were then raised in Islam. It seems to have been influential on his detestation of Turks, whom he mercilessly impaled by the tens of thousands. Another victim of Ottoman slavery was George of Hungary, author of a Treatise on the Customs, Living Conditions, and Wickedness of the Turks (1481). The 15th Century literature on captive life under the Ottomans11 can probably teach a thing or two about the reality of Christian-Muslim relations.
Spain and Portugal are also very telling on that. In Évora, you can admire the statue of Gerald the Fearless (12th Century), hero of the Reconquista, holding the head of a Moor. Spain has a great national tradition around the figure of Santiago Matamoros12, literally Saint James the Moor-slayer. This is “only” national imagery, but it already says a lot on the way Islamic rule13 was perceived by the Iberians.
In the direct aftermath of the Reconquista, Spanish authorities tried to assimilate Moriscos but failed to do so. The population was far more extreme and rather wanted to have them expelled. A very strong emphasis was put in the intellectual discourse concerning the Morisco Question not only on cultural differences14, but also on the violence committed on Christians by them. Academic sources on al-Andalus contain various anecdotes that confirm the ill-treatment of Christians by Muslims15. We do not know to what extent violence existed towards Christians, but the extreme virulence of anti-Morisco propaganda gives hints on how it was perceived. For example, a humanist opponent of the expulsion of Moriscos, Pedro de Valencia (1555-1620)16, considers arguments given at the time and tries to refute them.
Some will not hesitate to say that it would not be an injustice to kill and eliminate the Moriscos who reside in Spain, because the visceral hatred they have towards us and the great danger they pose to the kingdom are so notorious, that they have already provided grounds for just war, killing many Spanish Christians every day in their villages and on the roads.17
De Valencia opposed this view, but we can be sure that if this wasn’t a common opinion, there would be no need to adress it. Moriscos were expelled en masse right after this text was published.
Since this article tries to counter the idea that Christian-Muslim brotherhood is undermined by Zionists, we may adress Judaism and Islamic Spain. Wikipedia teaches us that
With the victory of Tariq ibn Ziyad in 711, the lives of the Sephardim changed dramatically. For the most part, the invasion of the Moors was welcomed by the Jews of Iberia. Both Muslim and Catholic sources tell that Jews provided valuable aid to the invaders.18 Once the city was captured, the defence of Córdoba was left in the hands of Jews, and Granada, Málaga, Seville, and Toledo were left to a mixed army of Jews and Moors. (…) In spite of the restrictions placed upon the Jews as dhimmis, life under Muslim rule was one of great opportunity in comparison to that under prior Catholic Visigoths, as was testified by the influx of Jews from abroad. To Jews throughout the Catholic and Muslim worlds, Iberia was seen as a land of relative tolerance and opportunity. After initial Arab-Berber victories, especially with the establishment of Umayyad dynasty rule by Abd al-Rahman I in 755, the native Jewish community was joined by Jews from the rest of Europe, as well as from Arab territories from Morocco to Mesopotamia (the latter region was known as Babylonia in Jewish sources).19
In 1492, after the Reconquista, Jews were expelled and settled partly in the Islamic World who welcomed them. This was the start of the Spanish Golden Age.
Some could say this is History and that people change their minds. We saw in the first article that the issues of clanic mentality, random ultraviolence and paranoia are still rampant and have deep sociobiological roots.
Hatred of the West and of Christendom exists in this worldview20, and there is no need to invoke zionist puppetmasters. Muslims and Islamists have a free-will, even if they don’t believe it. They act according to their own interests. If some are violent, it is no wonder: Muhammad already was in his time, and he is the perfect example for every Muslim. The philosopher Rémi Brague likes to recall that when one says “this is not Islam” when confronted to Islamic violence, he probably doesn’t know that the Life of Muhammad (the Sirah) written by his first biographer, Ibn Ishaq (704-767), gives several examples of violence and destruction on his part. His disciples followed his lead. In an 8th Century chronicle, the Muslim al-Razi says that
He [Abd al-Rahman I, founder of the Umayyad dynasty that ruled the greater part of Iberia in Al-Andalus] would take all the bodies which Christians honor and call saints, and he would burn them; and he would burn their beautiful churches.21
This article could go on with countless examples and anecdotes gathered from all 14 Centuries of Islamic History. Here are a couple of recent ones from Europe.
12 April 2024: German police arrest teenagers ‘planning Islamic State-style terror attack on churches’
26 January 2023: Machete attacks by a Moroccan at Spanish churches leave one dead and four wounded
5 April 2021: Easter: mother and four daughters suspected of preparing an “imminent” islamist attack against churches
29 October 2020: France attack: Three killed in 'Islamist terrorist' stabbings in a church
And this is far from being exhaustive. I will close this article with a very small part of some social media reactions we could see to the burning of Notre-Dame on April 15, 2019, 5 years ago. A Maghrebi leader of the Student Union UNEF (30 000 members) made very revealing comments on that too.
Maybe they are just not our friends.
In the 6th Century before Christ, Aesop wrote a very telling Fable on Hermes and the Arabs: “Hermes filled a cart with lies and dishonesty and all sorts of wicked tricks, and he journeyed in this cart throughout the land, going hither and thither from one tribe to another, dispensing to each nation a small portion of his wares. When he reached the land of the Arabs, so the story goes, his cart suddenly broke down along the way and was stuck there. The Arabs seized the contents of the cart as if it were a merchant's valuable cargo, stripping the cart bare and preventing Hermes from continuing on his journey, although there were still some people he had not yet visited. As a result, Arabs are liars and charlatans, as I myself have learned from experience. There is not a word of truth that springs from their lips.”
Now Rassemblement National. I will only use Front National for practical reasons.
Soral knows marketing well, and knows that there is a market for that. Other examples of more or less opportunist antizionists come to mind, mainly on the traditional Catholic side, where one can find editors, journalists, authors and internet content creators who emphasize comically on antizionism in order to gain exposure and of course, money.
Who are in the vast majority migrants themselves. There were around 40 000 “native” French Jews in the early 1900s, coming exclusively from Alsace-Lorraine and a couple of cities such as Avignon and Marseille. Interesting figures such as philosopher Simone Weil or Raymond Aron (who, it must be noted, said in the 1980s that he prefered Front National members in the Conseil des ministres rather than communists) came from these “native” Alsatian Jew communities. The rest came from Germany and Eastern-Europe in the 1917-1940 period, the second wave coming from North-Africa after Colonial wars of Independance.
Especially since they are targeted, for example in 2012, where a Jewish school was attacked.
Serge Malik (another co-founder of the association), Histoire secrète de SOS Racisme, 1990.
Quoted by memory; he answered that on a national radio (RMC) in 2021, when confronted with the fact the he had dinner with the daughter of Joachim von Ribbentrop.
Their position on the Israelo-Palestinian conflict led several “Right-winged” Maghrebi to express their intention to vote for them. The tribe always guides them.
After every single race riots, massive social measures are taken to pour money into the ghettoes.
In the 13th Century, king Sancho IV of Castile (1295–1312) wrote a book of advice to his son, where he said that “The Moor is nothing but a dog (…) Those things which Christian considers evil and sinful, he considers goodly and beneficial for salvation; and what we think beneficial for salvation, he considers sinful.”, quoted in R. Fletcher, Moorish Spain, 1992 p. 135
I remember reading, years ago, the account of a Medieval Spaniard who talked about priests being spat on and thrown rocks at by Muslims when going out, but I sadly cannot find the source back. However, I found an account on Christian missionaries in Savafid Iran (1501–1736) that is very similar in essence, and confirms a relative form of universality of Islamic behavior: “People and especially young boys on the street might insult and curse the friars, throwing rocks at them and calling them dogs.” Chronicle of the Carmelites, vol. 1, p. 163, 446‒447, quoted in Rudi Matthee, “Safavid Iran and the Christian Missionary Experience”, MIDÉO, 35 | 2020, 65-100.
See Grace Magnier, Pedro de Valencia and the Catholic Apologists of the Expulsion of the Moriscos, 2010.
“Ofreceráse a alguno decir que no sería injusticia matar y acabar los moriscos que están en España, siendo tan notorio el odio capital que nos tienen y tan grande el riesgo en que el Reino está por ellos, que ya han dado causas de guerra justa matando cada día muchos cristianos españoles en sus lugares y por los caminos, como lo hacen en cogiéndolos a solas y todas las veces que pueden a su salvo, sin ira ni ofensa particular, más de por la oposición de la nación y de la ley.” in Tratado acerca de los moriscos de España, 1608.
Norman Roth, Jews, Visigoths and Muslims in medieval Spain : cooperation and conflict, 1994, pp.79–90
Due to their belief in the Holy Trinity, Christians are seen as guilty of the gravest sin in islam, which is “association” (shirk). Incarnation is rejected in the exact same way as in Judaism. Muslims usually tell Christians that they “respect Jesus and Mary”, but if they truly respected Jesus, they would believe in His Divinity, and they wouldn’t reject the crucifixion. The Quran (4:157–158) says that “they killed [Jesus] not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not.” The Apostle’s words come to mind against this : “Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead? (…) For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ raised: And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.” (Corinthians 1, 15).
Cronica del Moro Rasis, translated in Dario Fernandez-Morero, The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise, 2016, p. 121.
Great sociological analysis, in the first part, as well as historiography, in the second.
Due to the expulsion of Muslims and Jews from the Peninsula and the presence of the Portuguese Empire in Sub-Saharan Africa (with the subsequent christianisation of Blacks), we don't have a significant muslim population to form this White-Brown alliance. The ones we do have are illiterate paki men who lack consciousness to even vote left-wing.
The pro-Palestine (read, anti-White/colonialism) crowd is comprised of the usual degenerate leftists. The occasional mullato appears, of course. Have begun seeing some reality detached duguinists crying out for a muslim alliance, but virtually no one takes them seriously.
Again, great article, keep up the good work.